Design a tool allowing both mentors and mentees to match based on interests, skills, profession, and current projects.
Mentors and mentees can’t always find someone. And even when they do, it isn’t always the right fit.
Mentorship addresses the social precedent for meaningful mentor relationships in the world today.
User research | Personas | Problem statements | Competitive audit
I interviewed 5 different people about their mentorship experiences and probed for their thoughts on what made those experiences good or bad. This helped me gain a sense of what people expect going into a mentorship relationship, which aided my approach in designing the mentorship platform.
Unavailability is a problem many people have when mentoring with someone. We needed a way to make it clear what mentors were getting before they signed up for it.
Inconsistency plagues many relationships today, so we needed to find a way to provide accountability to mentors and mentees alike to help keep people on track with their commitments.
Many people today can’t find anyone to mentor them. While this may be for various reasons, a tool like the one we were building needed to make it easier than trying to find someone in person, since that clearly has not worked for the people struggling here.
Many people just don’t know anyone who can mentor them or who would want to let them mentor them, so this platform we were designing couldn’t rely solely on mutual connections.
Sitemap | Paper wireframes | Digital wireframes | Low-fidelity prototype | Usability study
We created a sitemap for the ideal mentorship website, based on our research.
Ideation with wireframes presented a great opportunity to think about target audience and empathize with the people who might use the platform.
Users go through an account creation phase (added from the first version) where they can sign up via LinkedIn. They then fill out their profile and can see resulting matches tailored to their own profile, needs, and wants.
View low-fidelity Prototype: desktop / mobile
Study type: Moderated usability study
Location: United States, remote and in-person
Participants: 5 participants
Length: 20-30 minutes
Our study led us to the following conclusions. In a nutshell: more transparency. The tool needs to inspire trust while assisting the building of rapport between potential mentors and mentees.
Based on our study,
Mockups | High-fidelity Prototype | Accessibility Considerations
Search-by-tag, Mentor ratings, and relevancy ratings at a glance were all suggested and implemented.
Multiple usability participants wanted to see reviews and credentials on the Mentor page.
Screen size mockups included the mobile variety which focused on emphasizing the most important part of each page so that nothing important was lost. Whereas Call-to-action buttons are small (yet prominently displayed) on a large screen because of the novelty factor. Buttons needed to retain their distinct size on mobile screens to allow adequate real estate for tapping.
High-fidelity prototypes focused on rich user experience while keeping everything clear, systematic, and concise.
Prototype: desktop / mobile
We needed to make sure colors showed up well (high-contrast) for all users, including the older demographic which we believe will make up many of the people using the tool. Font-size was an issue that we wrestled with in order to best display information without compromising on professionalism in the brand. Clearly labeling forms was a top priority in order to make them accessible to everyone.
Takeaways | What I learned
“I think it's really simple.”
–Krista F.
Mentorship is a complex feature of the human existence with a unique, person-by-peron dynamic. Instead of forcing people to use a “one-size-fits-all” approach to finding & interacting with mentors, we fostered an atmosphere where individuals get to decide how they would reach out to and interact with their prospective partners.
View Case Study Deck.
Let's connect!
zachary@dewfire.com